LCAC speed does not erase vulnerability

Is the United States Navy too dependent on LCACs?

LCACs are fast and useful, but their advantages are clearest in a controlled environment and become less reassuring in a heavily contested approach.

The LCAC gives the United States far more connector speed than a conventional landing craft. Its survivability is less reassuring outside a benign or controlled environment. A fast hovercraft still has to cross a threatened route, reach a suitable beach, unload, and return for the next wave. The French fast-hull alternative raises the same trade among speed, payload, shore access, and exposure in contested littorals.