How did landing-craft tactics and equipment improve, and could better amphibious capacity have saved Norway?
Short answerLater forces had more and faster landing craft with stronger support, while the Norway campaign also needed much better command control.
NotesLater landing craft became faster and more numerous, with more supporting firepower. For Norway specifically, better commander control was as important as the craft themselves. The exchange keeps material capacity and command arrangements together rather than treating amphibious failure as a single equipment problem.