Why the name Invincible took time to return

Did Invincible's catastrophic loss at Jutland explain why the Royal Navy waited so long to reuse the name?

Partly; the loss and the name's hubristic tone mattered, but the Navy eventually judged the ship's employment rather than the name to have been at fault.

The destruction of HMS Invincible with almost all hands made immediate reuse of the name emotionally difficult. 'Invincible' could itself be read as hubristic after such a loss. The later carrier restored the name because institutional memory did not treat the word as permanently cursed. In this interpretation, a cruiser-type ship had been used in a capital-ship role and ambushed, making employment rather than naming the central failure.