Q&A · 3:47:35-3:49:06

What force structure should the Imperial Navy have built?

A proposed alternative to the Empire's battleship-heavy fleet combines Venator-derived capital ships with many more cruisers, light carriers, and patrol vessels.

Question

Should the Imperial Navy have emphasized lighter ships, small carriers, raiders, and popular support instead of following Tarkin Doctrine?

Short answer

Yes. A Venator-derived capital ship backed by many more cruisers and smaller presence vessels would be more useful than an oversized Star Destroyer fleet.

Notes

A modified Venator lineage would give the Imperial Navy a more useful capital ship than continued concentration on the Imperial Star Destroyer. Better fighters and a strong cruiser design would supply a more flexible combat force. Political control and routine presence require many ships in many places, which makes smaller cruisers and patrol vessels more useful than a few intimidating battle fleets. The Empire's preference for blasting resistance instead of maintaining everyday presence leaves it with the wrong force structure for securing popular support.