Molloy's court martial separates courage from command ability

Molloy sought an official hearing to answer criticism that Caesar had failed to close and obey Howe's signals. He had previously commanded several ships, including multiple third rates, so simple inexperience does not explain his conduct. At the 1795 court martial, Roger Curtis prosecuted the case and Molloy argued that damage had made his ship unmanageable. Evidence from the ship's personnel did not sustain that defence. The court distinguished personal bravery from professional performance, dismissing Molloy from Caesar without formally declaring him a coward. He never again received a command.