Would Fisher have been a better wartime First Lord?

Would appointing John Fisher as First Lord when Kitchener became War Secretary have improved British wartime direction?

It could have strengthened professional military advice, but Fisher's own erratic schemes mean the change was not certain to produce better policy.

Replacing Winston Churchill with John Fisher as First Lord would have placed two experienced service figures, Fisher and Kitchener, at the center of wartime government. That pairing makes the counterfactual interesting. Fisher also generated unconventional plans of his own, so professional expertise did not guarantee consistently sound cabinet judgment. The change might have helped, but it cannot be treated as an automatic cure for the Admiralty's strategic problems.