Q&A · 2:06:31-2:14:18

Deterring Japan without revealing Britain's whole hand

A credible Far Eastern deterrent needs more than a token squadron, but basing a flexible Eastern Fleet in the Indian Ocean avoids exposing it to an opening strike.

Question

How many modern ships would Britain need before sending older carriers and battlecruisers east as a real deterrent to Japan?

Short answer

A token force is not enough; Britain needs a flexible multi-carrier Eastern Fleet based safely in the Indian Ocean and able to reinforce either theater.

Notes

The initial estimate for freeing two older carriers and two battlecruisers calls for three Illustrious-class carriers and four King George V-class battleships already in service. The discussion then questions whether such a 1939 deployment would help, since sending a small force can reveal the maximum Britain is able to spare. Sustaining a more imposing force later could require four or five carriers and comparable capital-ship strength, tying up ships needed elsewhere. An Eastern Fleet based around Ceylon is preferred because it could train, rotate ships with the Mediterranean, and move east when required. A Japanese strike into the Indian Ocean before the fall of Singapore and the Dutch East Indies would have to pass through Southeast Asian straits, making a large carrier force harder to conceal. Major refits would take place safely in India. The time matters: Japan's fleet in 1939 had yet to reach its late-1941 strength, and a British force alongside the American fleet could force Japan to consider two separate opponents.