Notable Point · 40:42-43:30

The electoral and naval-spending trap

Replacing Roosevelt with a harder-line expansionist also risks replacing the political coalition most willing to fund the fleet needed for confrontation.

Notes

The political setup must remove both William McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt, whose knowledge and caution make the proposed war unlikely. Only a hard-line Southern Democrat plausibly supplies the required hemispheric expansionism in 1900. Democrats of the period were generally less committed to naval expenditure, creating a contradiction between the policy that provokes war and the fleet needed to fight it. The scenario therefore requires a different political coalition as well as different naval orders.