An early account casts HMS Dreadnought as a deliberate strategic bolt against the German Navy. The article argues that the new ship could not pass through the Kiel Canal, forcing Tirpitz to choose between building obsolete ships and waiting years for canal enlargement. It also claims Germany bought Dreadnought's plans while Britain was already correcting the deficiencies of what had been a trial ship. The interpretation is broad revisionism, and its portrayal of Lord Charles Beresford as the leading opposition at that moment is chronologically suspect. Dramatic naval narratives arose early, and their chronology and supporting evidence still need testing.
Chapter · 3:27:53-3:30:20
An early revisionist story linked Dreadnought to the Kiel Canal
An Atlantic magazine account portrayed HMS Dreadnought as a calculated blow that temporarily devalued Germany's canal and induced it to copy an uncorrected trial design.