Why Douglas Haig might communicate better than Beatty at Jutland

How might Douglas Haig have performed if he replaced David Beatty in command of the battlecruisers at Jutland?

He might have communicated and handled reconnaissance better because he valued qualified staff work and understood that scouts must report what they find.

The command swap is judged chiefly through staff selection and reconnaissance. Haig required appointments to come from qualified staff officers, making a communications arrangement like Beatty's reliance on Seymour less likely in the scenario. His cavalry background also made reporting information part of reconnaissance, rather than leaving the scout's discovery disconnected from the commander. Those habits are the reasons given for expecting better communication at Jutland. The broader defence of Haig distinguishes responsibility at the top from personal blame for every failure under his command.