Canadian nuclear infrastructure and the distance problems facing both Canada and Australia make a shared submarine approach worth considering. One pragmatic division would have Britain supply reactor expertise while Australia or Canada builds boats and chooses systems suited to national needs. Collaboration offers the greatest savings in expensive specialist work such as hull form, quieting, and other submarine technologies. Shared design need not dictate identical combat systems, allowing each navy to choose British or American equipment while pooling the hardest engineering work.
Chapter · 48:46-52:22
A cooperative nuclear-submarine path for Canada and Australia
Canada and Australia share long-distance submarine requirements that could support a cooperative division of nuclear-submarine design and construction work.