Was Churchill's Gallipoli campaign fundamentally foolish, or did it fail in execution?
Short answerThe answer finds a strategic rationale but strongly criticises execution, arguing that landings and the naval attack should have been coordinated.
NotesGallipoli is presented as an attempt to escape the strategic deadlock elsewhere. The criticism centres on execution, especially conducting the naval bombardment before the troops were ready. The proposed alternative is to force the straits while landing troops at the same time. That could have divided the defenders' artillery between ships and forces ashore. Success under that alternative is a counterfactual judgment, not an outcome demonstrated by the campaign.