Clarke argues that cuts to early dreadnought numbers left the Royal Navy less willing to take technical risks with St Vincent. Building two Dreadnoughts and four Bellerophons would have provided a six-ship foundation before the next design decision. Instead, repeated reductions left seven ships across the early classes where there could have been ten. The counterfactual is that a larger opening fleet would have allowed more ambitious designs and left Britain comfortably ahead of Germany by 1912-13. Individual ships cost roughly £1.76-1.78 million, which he considers a small saving beside total government expenditure. Retiring older battleships sooner could have released money and crews for the new ships. The argument connects short-term economies with the narrower fleet margin and greater strategic anxiety Britain faced later.
Notable Point · 17:45-20:36
Early budget cuts and Britain's dreadnought lead
A larger early dreadnought programme could have increased Britain's margin over Germany and made experimental St Vincent designs easier to accept.