Notable Point · 38:24-40:08

Phonetic alphabets and a possible second meaning of 'Nuts'

Comparing historical alphabets suggests a possible link between the signal word for N and McAuliffe's 'Nuts' reply, while leaving his intention uncertain.

Notes

The 1915 and 1937 phonetic alphabets used different words for several letters. In the earlier alphabet, 'Nuts' represented N. This suggests a possible additional meaning for McAuliffe's famous reply to a surrender demand during the Battle of the Bulge. The proposed connection depends on the assumption that a man of his generation would have known the older alphabet. It remains an interpretation of the reply, without evidence here establishing that this was his intention.