What if the US 1.1-inch and the 25 mm anti-aircraft guns worked well, while the 20 mm Oerlikon and 40 mm pom-pom were unreliable?
Short answerNavies would select the weapons that worked, with Hispano-based 20 mm guns and the 40 mm Bofors suggested as alternatives.
NotesProcurement would follow effective weapons in the altered scenario. The Oerlikon was bought because it worked, so an unreliable version would create demand for another gun. A Hispano-based cannon is suggested as a possible 20 mm substitute. The 40 mm Bofors provides the proposed alternative to an unreliable pom-pom.