What did the panel make of a report about reanimated brain tissue controlling a robot?
Short answerIt became an example of why researchers must ask whether a possible experiment should be done and what consequences it may have.
NotesThe audience question describes an experiment involving reanimated brain tissue, a robot, and piano training, but the discussion does not verify those details. The response turns instead to institutional ethics: scientists and engineers often concentrate on whether something can be done before asking whether it should be done. Historians and other disciplines are cast, half-jokingly, as the people who interrupt that momentum to consider consequences. References to Warhammer 40,000 and the torment nexus frame the concern through science fiction rather than provide evidence about the experiment.