Foxo objects to planning on the assumption that combat efficiency will always remain high. Expecting every hit to produce a kill can make a force appear to need fewer weapons and less depth than a difficult campaign would demand. The same criticism applies to assuming that future wars will always be chosen on favorable terms. A fleet still needs strategic depth when it cannot control where or under what conditions it must fight.
Notable Point · 2:58:28-2:59:39
The risks of assuming perfect weapons performance and wars of choice
Foxo challenges force plans that assume reliable kills, high combat efficiency, and control over the circumstances of every war.