Q&A · 4:01:13-4:03:30

Why referendum government demands voters' time

The panel disagrees over legislation by referendum, focusing on how voters would find time to understand unfamiliar policy questions and assess competing information.

Question

Would legislation by referendum be an ideal system if voters were educated and engaged?

Short answer

There is disagreement: one participant calls it ideal, while the objection is that routine votes would demand unpaid study that many voters cannot undertake.

Notes

One panelist describes legislation by referendum as an ideal that requires an educated, engaged electorate. Clarke challenges that ideal because people with jobs, families and other commitments cannot continually study unfamiliar technical questions. He supports referendums for major constitutional decisions, while warning that routine use would leave voters dependent on information supplied by actors trying to influence the result. His objection concerns the unpaid research burden placed on voters, without assuming that people without specialist knowledge lack intelligence.