Are mobile anti-aircraft systems cheaper than permanent defenses?
Short answerThe panel disputes the general claim and identifies the extra vehicles, power supplies, drivers, and maintenance needed to move a complete battery.
NotesAn audience claim that mobile anti-aircraft systems are cheaper prompts a discussion of the equipment surrounding the launchers. A battery also needs search and targeting radar, power, reload arrangements, and command and control. Making each element mobile adds vehicles, drivers, fuel, and maintenance support. Heavy-vehicle crews are described as expensive and in demand in both military and civilian employment. The panel compares that arrangement with fixed power supplies and protected command positions, where the same budget could provide more redundancy. The passage presents cost drivers, rather than a priced comparison proving that every fixed battery is cheaper.