Q&A ยท 55:14-55:39

A large combatant does not need a Mark 29 launcher

Adding size does not make every legacy launcher worthwhile when modern close-in systems can cover the intended defensive layer.

Question

Would a roughly 45,000-ton surface combatant need a reliable Mark 29 octuple box launcher alongside its VLS?

Short answer

No; other self-defence options exist, and SeaRAM offers a more relevant independent close-in missile installation.

Notes

The preference expressed is against adding a Mark 29 launcher to the proposed large combatant. SeaRAM is offered as an alternative if a separate missile installation is wanted. A complete self-defence fit is left unspecified.