How disruptive would Blowpipe be if Britain obtained it in 1945 and used it in Korea and later conflicts?
Short answerA thirty-year technology jump would make it highly useful and damaging, though not automatically decisive by itself.
NotesBlowpipe would provide Britain with a useful short-range air-defense weapon in the proposed Korean War scenario. The initial assessment resists calling that capability devastating by itself. The date then changes the comparison: obtaining a weapon associated with service from 1975 in 1945 introduces roughly thirty years of technological advance. That gap is the reason for expecting it to inflict substantial damage in the counterfactual. Later users included Chile, Argentina, Canada, and Portugal, while its installation on Israeli Gal-class submarines connects the missile to the submarine premise of the question.