Notable Point · 30:28-34:10

Purpose and armour place ships on a battlecruiser spectrum

British economic-warfare battle cruisers are distinguished from German designs intended to support the battle line, then armour coverage and subdivision show why one thickness figure is insufficient.

Notes

Battlecruiser classification depends on design purpose as well as protection. The terminology used here distinguishes early British two-word battle cruisers, such as the Invincible and Indefatigable classes, from more heavily protected one-word battlecruisers. The former specialised in economic warfare and scouting; German designs also needed to support the battle line because they might have to fight past the Royal Navy. The proposed Lexington class supplies another example of the economic-warfare type. Protective clothing provides an analogy for increasing coverage along the spectrum towards fast battleships and full battleships. A thick belt does not reveal how much of the hull is protected or what lies behind the armour. Bulkheads, subdivision, and systems that limit flooding determine whether protection works as a complete scheme.