Removing hangars and other support spaces from amphibious ships transfers costs into deployment and maintenance. The preferred alternative is three LHDs and three repeated Bay-class ships with permanent hangars. The criticism of Albion and Bulwark includes deleted hospital and gym facilities as well as hangars, while the Bay-class criticism concerns hangars. A proper hangar provides cranes, lighting, stores, and shelter for safe helicopter maintenance during long deployments. Without it, aircraft return for longer and more expensive refits, turning a visible construction saving into a larger through-life bill. Procurement economies therefore have to include operational and maintenance consequences.
Notable Point · 2:16:53-2:19:43
Deleting hangars creates an amphibious false economy
Permanent hangars support safe helicopter maintenance during long deployments, while omitting them can produce larger repair bills later.