British naval advice changed as strategic requirements changed. Canadian public promises and private intentions also gave Admiralty planners different signals about what the government would actually support. Advice framed around one could conflict with the other. One proposed explanation for the resulting friction is that Canada's Atlantic proximity encouraged British expectations of political similarity. In that interpretation, Australia's distance made different local requirements easier for British planners to accept.
Notable Point ยท 18:35-20:09
Admiralty advice met Canadian political ambiguity
Changing requirements and a gap between Canada's public promises and private intentions help explain apparently inconsistent Admiralty advice.